Saturday, November 27

Homeland Security Seizes 70+ Websites for Copyright and Trademark Violations

The U.S. government’s crackdown on file sharing and counterfeiting has taken a new and disturbing turn.

Yesterday, we reported that the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement office had seized Torrent-Finder.com, a site that linked to other sites that hosted and shared torrent files of copyrighted material. The news itself was not too unusual; what struck us as out of order was that the site had been shut down without the owner being notified and without a court conviction or, to our knowledge, any other legal proceedings.

At the time, we knew that several other websites had also been seized; however, today, we are hearing reports that as many as 77 different websites have been seized and shut down, all without any notification or warning to the owners.

As the owner of Torrent-Finder.com said, the sites were seized “without any previous complaint or notice from any court… While I was contacting GoDaddy I noticed the DNS had changed. Godaddy had no idea what was going on and until now they do not understand the situation, and they say it was totally from ICANN.”

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is seizing sites directly from ICANN because of complaints filed against them; the agency is not doing so under the auspices of the Digital Millenium Coptyright Act (DMCA) or a more recently ratified, so-called “censorship” law, the Combating Online Infringements and Counterfeits Act, or COICA, which was created specifically to address the issue of piracy.

While both of these laws have serious issues that many free-web advocates find disturbing, the implementation of either law might be better than no law at all.

Rather than using DMCA or COICA, the DHS has, as one spokesperson told The New York Times, “executed court-ordered seizure warrants against a number of domain names.”

So far, TorrentFreak is counting 77 domains seized. These URLs indicate that sites were used to peddle counterfeit goods as well as illegally shared media files.

What we can’t debate is that the government has a right to enforce its own laws. If copyrights are being infringed upon and goods are being counterfeited, the government does have the authority to put a stop to those activities.

But when legislators have taken great pains to construct and pass laws that create procedures for dealing with these exact issues, it does seem a bit off that none of those procedures were used.

For example, because of COICA, there is a blacklist of censored URLs. If infringement of copyright or the trafficking of counterfeited goods is central to the operation of the website, the Attorney General can ask a court to place that website on the blacklist.

The DHS is bypassing this law and its procedures to quickly stamp out file-sharing and counterfeiting — perhaps in time to thwart knock-off holiday shopping, we could speculate. Nevertheless, this great haste is as confusing as it is perturbing; it doesn’t sit well with the traditionally American sense of due process.

What do you make of these seizures? Do you think Homeland Security is right to close these sites, specifically in this manner? Let us know your opinions in the comments.


(source:mashable.com)

1 comment:

  1. This is certainly going to begin happening more often as internet content becomes more regulated and policed.

    In fairness to all parties:

    Violating website owners should pay damages to rightful owners of content

    Violating website owners should be notified of their infringement and given an opportunity to rectify situation (before being shut down).

    Measures should be put in place to prevent violators from setting up same content at different location

    Brett Miller
    http://www.customsoftwarebypreston.com

    ReplyDelete