Showing posts with label Things on Election Day. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Things on Election Day. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 2

Heated Campaign Ends as Votes Are Cast

American voters began heading to the polls Tuesday morning in elections that will recalibrate the balance of power in Washington and in state houses across the nation, with Republicans poised to make big gains, particularly in the House of Representatives where they expect to seize a majority, and Democrats anxious to stem their losses and hold control of the Senate.With polls showing the public disquieted over a weak economy and generally disapproving of how President Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress are leading the country, Republicans seemed well within reach of capturing the 39 seats that they need to win a majority in the House, which Democrats now hold by a margin of 255 to 178, with two vacancies.

If they succeed, the Republicans would break the one-party lock that Democrats have held on Washington since Mr. Obama’s victory in 2008. They would also set new parameters for the remaining two years of the president’s term, potentially slamming the brakes on what has been, by any historical standard, a remarkably ambitious agenda, and forcing the administration to rethink many of its policies, especially on the economy.

In the Senate, where Democrats nominally hold 59 seats, including those of two independents aligned with them, the Republicans stood to make gains but not win the 10 seats they need to clinch a majority. Republicans seemed likely to pick up Democratic seats in North Dakota, Indiana and Arkansas, and were also fighting close battles in Colorado, Illinois, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Washington.

In all, 37 Senate seats are being voted on across the country on Tuesday. There are also governor’s races in 37 states, including California, Texas, Florida and New York, where the Democrat, Andrew M. Cuomo, seemed well-positioned to defeat the Republican, Carl P. Paladino, who also has strong support from Tea Party supporters.

Currently, Democrats hold 26 governorships and Republicans hold 24, but that balance is expected to tilt. Republicans are likely to make big gains, with candidates leading in polls in at least 10 states currently held by Democrats, including Kansas, Michigan, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Wyoming.

Both parties said that voter turnout, which typically runs about 40 percent nationally in a midterm year, would be a critical factor in Tuesday’s results. Polls show Republican voters substantially more energized and enthusiastic than Democrats, particularly among the Tea Party faithful, which are a factor in more than 130 races nationwide.

As the polls opened shortly before or after dawn in many states, candidates headed to their local polls trailed by photographers, while their campaigns fired off last-minute e-mails exhorting supporters to get out and cast their ballots. Phone banks continued to work in a frenzy, and ads continued to run on television.

In Ohio, a battleground state, Democrats sent out an e-mail congratulating volunteers for their early get-out-the-vote efforts. The message also included an important detail: “The weather forecast is sunny with highs in the 50s across the state.”

Former President Bill Clinton was calling radio programs in Ohio, on behalf of the Democratic governor, Ted Strickland, who is in a tough re-election fight.

And at the White House, Mr. Obama was also giving live Election Day radio interviews in a bid to lift support for Democratic candidates, including the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, who was locked in a tight race against Sharron Angle, the Republican candidate backed by the Tea Party.

The House Republican leader, John A. Boehner, who is the likely speaker if Republicans win a majority, planned to vote at home in West Chester, Ohio, before returning to Washington to watch the election returns. Mr. Boehner, campaigning in his home state in recent days, has said he expects a big night for Republicans as a result of a broad public backlash against Democrats and Mr. Obama’s agenda.

“There’s an uprising going on around this country,” Mr. Boehner said. “I have seen it all over my district, all over Ohio, and all over the other 150 American cities I have been in this year. People have had enough. They have had enough.”

In some races, the final tallies are not expected to be known for several days if not longer, particularly in the Alaska Senate race, where the incumbent, Lisa Murkowski, is running as a write-in candidate after losing the Republican primary.

But the voting on Tuesday will effectively cap what has been a bitterly fought and hugely expensive midterm election campaign that to a large degree has become a referendum on the economy, Mr. Obama and the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi of California, and an outlet of public frustration, with little focus on substantive issues beyond vague calls by many Republicans for smaller government and reduced spending.

While perhaps inevitable, that Mr. Obama might be the target of voter ire in a year when he is not on the ballot is a fascinating twist given that more than any other president in recent history he has sought to illustrate Congress as an equal branch of government, deferring to lawmakers on many of the details of the huge legislative efforts of the past two years, including the health care overhaul and tighter financial regulation.

In an e-mail to supporters on Tuesday morning, Senator John Cornyn of Texas, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, said Mr. Obama had allowed the Democratic Congress to spin out of control.

“Obama has broken promises about his policies, and also about the kind of leader he would be,” Mr. Cornyn wrote. “Instead of proposing practical solutions and building bipartisan consensus, Obama outsourced his entire domestic agenda to liberal power brokers in Congress. If we get the chance, Republicans will restore limited government to Washington.”

Amid the voter frustration over the economy and continuing high unemployment, Mr. Obama and Congressional Democrats found themselves struggling all year to take credit for the many legislative achievements of the past two years, including the economic stimulus program, the health care law and tougher financial regulation.

Republicans, meanwhile, were able to capitalize in the creeping sense among voters that government has grown too big and spent too much in recent years. The details were often immaterial. Mr. Boehner, who delivered Republican votes including his own for the big financial system bailout in 2008, has urged voters to oust Democratic incumbents to send Mr. Obama a message that they are tired of “all the bailouts.”

And Republican candidates have repeatedly called for reduced government spending, but without offering specific programs that would be subject to cuts. They have also loudly proclaimed a need to reduce the federal deficits while also advocating for a continuation of all of the Bush-era tax cuts, which would add another $4 trillion to the deficits over the next 10 years.

In the meantime, Democrats failed to articulate much vision for the future, arguing instead that Republicans simply wanted to turn the clock back to the Bush administration. Led by Mr. Obama they sought to reassure voters that the economy, while still weak, was improving slowly and steadily. Unemployment remains at nearly 10 percent or higher in many parts of the country.

And it is unclear if divided government will lead to greater compromise or simply more of the bitter partisanship that has characterized Washington in recent years. Either way, members of Congress have many weighty issues confronting them, and some will not wait until newly elected lawmakers take office in January.

All of the Bush era tax cuts will expire on Jan. 1 if Congress fails to act in a lame duck session. The temporary spending resolution to finance the federal government will expire in early December. And reports are expected around the same time, from the Pentagon on the possibility of eliminating the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy on gay soldiers, and from the president’s debt commission on long-term fiscal recommendations.


(source:nytimes.com)

Things to watch on Election Day

Against the backdrop of a bitterly divided Congress and an angry and frustrated electorate, the most expensive midterm election in history finally comes to a climax Tuesday as America votes on 37 Senate seats and all 435 seats in the House of Representatives.
Here are five things to watch as the day plays out:
218 is the number: Republicans need a net gain of 39 seats to reach the 218-seat majority needed to control the House. While most experts believe they'll win control of the chamber, it remains to be seen how big a margin they might have when the new Congress is sworn in next year.
What happens if GOP wins control of the House?
Republicans are also expected to make gains in the Senate but come up short of the 10 seats they need to win control there.
What's at stake in the Senate
If Republicans gain control of the House, look for them to take steps to try to roll back portions of health care reform; extend the Bush-era tax cuts, if the current Congress doesn't when it returns after the election; write legislation for targeted tax credits for small businesses, which they believe will spur job growth; and trim the federal budget by as much as $150 billion.
But without control of the Senate, they'll need Democrats there to vote with them to get bills passed. And then they'll need the signature of President Obama, who opposes at least parts of that agenda.
CNN pundits predict the 2010 vote
Turning out the vote: Polls show Republicans more energized than Democrats, which suggests a higher turnout of GOP voters. While Americans aren't happy with either party, they tend to vote against the one in power.Obama has drawn large crowds lately in a series of rallies at college campuses to try to energize young voters, a key segment that helped elect him two years ago. The question is whether they'll come out to vote on Tuesday.
Midterm election at a glance
The year of the outsider: With so much frustration focused on Washington, incumbents began to fall in the primaries, and that wave is expected to continue Tuesday.
The insurgent Tea Party has had a major influence on the Republican Party and has some Democrats in close races distancing themselves from Obama and Democratic leaders in an effort to save their political careers.
While the number of winning "outsider" candidates will be determined Tuesday, the larger question won't be addressed until January, when the new Congress takes their seats: Will their influence in the House and Senate change Washington and will it further polarize it? Most analysts say an insurgent voting bloc will create an even more partisan Congress.
And how frustrated will voters be by the next time they get to select their legislative leaders?
What the Twitterverse is saying about the election
Speaking of 2012... The next presidential race begins with these midterms -- although if you live in an early-voting or key battleground state, you would have sworn that it's been going on for months, based on the number of visits by potential Republican candidates.
The early favorite among those who seek to unseat Obama will be the person who can make political capital out of the chits he or she has collected through endorsements and fundraising for winning House and Senate candidates.
2008 Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin has gotten much attention for endorsing Tea Party candidates in a number of high-profile races. But South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint has emerged as a GOP kingmaker, with a string of underdog candidates whom he backed winning unlikely victories.
Palin is already looked on by the party establishment as unelectable, because she's a polarizing figure outside of the party's conservative base. But DeMint could take the blame if the GOP fails to win the Senate.
DeMint's candidates -- most notably Delaware's Christine O'Donnell -- beat establishment-backed Republicans in primaries, but are expected to have a tougher time in the general election.
When might we know the outcome? Several key races in the eastern half of the country could give a good indication of how the House will go. But with key Senate races in states out west -- including Alaska, where the polls don't close until 1 a.m. Eastern time -- some races won't be decided until Wednesday morning, if then. Alaska's Republican primary wasn't decided until incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski conceded a week after the vote, while absentee ballots were still being counted.
Now running as a write-in candidate, Murkowski is in a tight race with Tea Party-backed Joe Miller, who beat her in the primary, and Democrat Scott McAdams.
And remember, the last Senate race in 2008 wasn't decided until after an eight-month court battle gave the seat to Democrat Al Franken.


(source:cnn.com)