Saturday, October 23

Brock Lesnar and Cain Velasquez Won’t Be Working Overtime

Don’t expect for the box office scrap between heavyweight king Brock Lesnar and Cain Velasquez to last too long.

Similarly to the last time he took the stage, Lesnar will be facing a foe who doesn’t have a propensity to go past the opening stanza. Prior to UFC 116, Shane Carwin held a perfect 12-0 mark with all of his fights ending within the first five minutes.

A 2ndRound arm-triangle choke quickly changed that.

Velasquez’s resume isn’t quite as extensive as Carwin’s, although it’s just as decorated. The Mexican-American holds an immaculate 8-0 record, with seven of his victories coming by way of (T)KO and one unanimous decision.

Five of his W’s have come within the 1stRound. He’s collected two wins in the middle round, to go with his one decision.

Velasquez has never finished a foe in the 3rdRound and Saturday signifies his first opportunity at a five round championship affair.

Lesnar, on the other hand, owns a dominant 5-1 record, with a pair of wins coming by some form of knockout. He’s earned two of his victories by way of submission and one via unanimous decision.

The former WWE stud’s triumphant mixed martial arts debut ended in the 1stRound. He’s collected three of his wins in the second stanza, with none ending in the third.

Lesnar’s sole blemish came in a 1stRound submission loss to Frank Mir in his UFC debut back in February 2008. He’s never gone into the championship rounds since donning Octagon gold.

While the odds of this blockbuster brawl going the distance are bleak – just ask the Gambling Gods – it doesn’t mean fans won’t be getting bang for their buck by ordering the pay-per-view event. A fast ending usually equates to a spectacular finish, so don’t fret over dropping $54.99 (HD is a must for this one, so I tacked on the extra 10 bones).

UFC 121 will be jumping off this evening inside the Honda Center in Anaheim, California.

Don’t blink.


(source::5thround.com)

Erin Andrews Peephole Content Back Online

Last year ESPN sideline reporter Erin Andrews made headlines around the world after peephole clips and photos were taken from her hotel room.

The man responsible for secretly setting up the camera and taping Andrews was eventually caught and was sentenced to 30 months in jail.

However, the subsequent damage had already been done.

The video, was leaked online (of course) and hundreds if not thousands of blogs and forums reposted the footage and images.

Over the past year Andrew’s laywers have worked diligently requesting website owners to remove the footage and images as they violate Andrews privacy and copy right laws.

Once a cease and desist letter was received, most websites obliged and quickly removed the material.

However, not all website owners took the legal threat seriously.

TheDirty.Com not only refused to remove the video and images from their website, but instead reposted them today.

“Erin Andrews, can you ask your lawyers if this is the post they want me to take down because I am confused?” wrote Hooman Karamaian the owner of TheDirty.com who uses the alias Nik Richie. “Welcome back to reality… your fault.- nik.”

TheDirty has been sued several times in the past.



(source:gossipjackal.com)

Friday, October 22

Colby Lewis gets Rangers 3 outs away

ARLINGTON, Texas -- Colby Lewis had no problem pitching the Texas Rangers out of the top of the eighth inning, allowing a harmless walk to Brett Gardner while striking out the side in Game 6 of the ALCS.

The 51,404 at Rangers Ballpark roared in unison as Lewis got Derek Jeter on a check-swing strike to end the eighth with the Rangers leading 6-1. Neftali Feliz is warming in the bullpen, which could mean Lewis' night is done. If it is, he just pitched the game of his life.

Lewis has allowed just three hits in the game. He pitched four hitless innings to start the game. Four of his seven strikeouts have come in the seventh and eighth innings.



(source:espn.go.com)

Ron Washington fine with Nick Swisher

ARLINGTON, Texas -- Texas Rangers manager Ron Washington said he doubts any other New York Yankee would have uttered such statements, but he has no problem with outfielder Nick Swisher boldly voicing his desire to face Cliff Lee in a Game 7.

"That's Swisher. He's a tough competitor," Washington said Friday during his pregame press conference. "He's not afraid to say what he feels and I have nothing against him saying what he feels."

On Thursday, Swisher was agitated by reporters asking teammates a couple of lockers down about going against Lee in a possible Game 7. The Yankees first had to face Rangers right-hander Colby Lewis in Friday night's Game 6. So Swisher interjected.


"You guys are talking about Cliff Lee?" Swisher said out loud in a room full of reporters. "[Expletive], who cares?" As Swisher walked off, he said, "I can't wait to hit against his [behind]."

Swisher somewhat broke out of an awful postseason slump in Game 5 with a home run. He has just two hits in 19 at-bats in the ALCS. In Game 3 against Lee, Swisher went 0-for-4 with a strikeout.

"I think if I was sitting in his shoes and I had to face Cliff Lee, I'd probably feel the same way," Washington said. "But, you know the game is not played with words; it's played between the lines. And, if he can back it up, I'll pat him on the back."

When Swisher was asked Thursday about voicing his opinion with reporters around, he interrupted the question at the mention of "Cliff Lee" and said he was done talking about the Rangers' ace. Lee beat the Yankees twice in the 2009 World Series with the Philadelphia Phillies and again in Game 3 of the ALCS.

"He's always had the heart of a champion and he's playing in an organization that is champions," Washington said. "You know, he's probably the only one that would probably come out and say something like that on that team. But, if he believes that, I have no problem with it."

Yankees manager Joe Girardi simply said he hopes Swisher is right and that the Yankees, down 3-2 to the Rangers, get the chance to see Lee again.

"I hope we do get a chance to face Cliff Lee [Saturday]. Because that would be a good thing," Girardi said. "We were talking about Game 3 [Lee's first start] before we even started the series. And the one thing is we didn't talk about Game 7 and Game 4, Game 5 and Game 6 ... Swish in a sense is right. We hope we do get to face him because that means there's a Game 7.


(source:sports.espn.go.com)

Phillies-Giants winner,Rangers beat Yankees, await

ARLINGTON, Texas - The Texas Rangers waited four minutes to start Friday's American League Championship Series game with the New York Yankees and 50 years to earn their first World Series berth.

Both were worth the wait.

The four-minute delay was courtesy of rain, but after that the Rangers went about their business, ending their long World Series drought with a 6-1 win over the Yankees at the Ballpark in Arlington.

So, if the Phillies make it to a third consecutive World Series, they will face a third different opponent. The Rangers dethroned the defending champions, four games to two, in the best-of-seven series.

No other franchise has taken longer to advance to its first World Series.

The Series will begin Wednesday at the home of the National League pennant winner.

Texas righthander Colby Lewis, who pitched in Japan the last two seasons, won his second game against the Yankees in this ALCS. He allowed just one run on three hits in eight innings, striking out seven and walking three.

"He went out there tonight and gave everything he had; he showed heart, he showed grit," Rangers manager Ron Washington said.

The series' MVP was Josh Hamilton, who hit .350 with four home runs and seven RBIs.

"I don't want to talk about myself; I want to talk about my teammates, because we are the reason we're standing here," Hamilton said. "This group is here because they don't know how to fail."

The Rangers, who began as the second expansion edition of the Washington Senators before moving to Texas for the 1972 season, had never won a postseason series before defeating the Tampa Bay Rays in this year's American League division series.

"We have a bunch of guys who show up every day and leave their heart on the field," Washington said.

On Friday night, Texas took a 1-0 lead by scoring in the first inning for the fourth time in this series. That improved the Rangers' first-inning advantage to 7-0.

Elvis Andrus led off with a double to extend his postseason hit streak to all 11 of the Rangers' games.

Hamilton hit a one-out single to shallow left field, and Andrus was held at third base. That brought the first trip to the mound by Yankees pitching coach Dave Elland, three batters into the game - not the best show of confidence in starter Phil Hughes.

Vladimir Guerrero then drove in Andrus with a groundout to second on a hit-and-run play.

Lewis pitched four hitless innings to begin the game. He allowed a first-inning walk to Curtis Granderson, who was thrown out by Bengie Molina when he tried to steal second.

Finally, Alex Rodriguez broke up the no-hitter with a leadoff double to left field in the fifth inning.

Rodriguez went to third on a deep flyout to center field by Lance Berkman and scored on a wild pitch that will provide fodder for advocates proposing a wider use of instant replay.

Television replays showed that the bouncing ball struck batter Nick Swisher just below his left knee.

Molina, the catcher, didn't react to the wild pitch, believing that Swisher would be awarded first base. Home-plate umpire Brian Gorman didn't make the call, and Rodriguez scored the tying run.

After his shaky first inning, Hughes settled down until his exit in the fifth.

Texas' No. 9 hitter, Mitch Moreland, opened the fifth with an infield hit and advanced to third on consecutive groundouts.

Hamilton then was issued his second intentional walk of the game, putting runners at the corners with two outs.

To show how much respect the Yankees have for Hamilton, they walked him to pitch to Guerrero for the second time this game. Guerrero is a career .320 hitter, and he showed why by drilling a two-run double that snapped the 1-1 tie and chased Hughes



(source:philly.com)

Richard Holbrooke and Pakistan

U.S. Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke is in Pakistan, again! Personally, I admire America’s commitment to strengthen democracy in Pakistan. I also applaud Obama’s efforts to stabilize Pakistan. For some, it is obvious that Holbrooke’s intense efforts and frequent visits are a clear sign that Washington is very serious about doing whatever it can to make sure that ordinary people, especially in Pakistan don’t give up on democracy. For this, Washington is still pouring money, but the deep rooted structural problems in Pakistan wont’ be, and they can’t be fixed in couple of months, or even couple of years. It will take a while to reverse the course and to stop Pakistan from crossing point of no return.



Washington has to do more, a lot more.

Since the tragedy of 9/11, Washington has done a lot for Pakistan, but it is worth remembering that whatever Washington did was, or most of it was in the form of military aid to supplement America’s war in Afghanistan. There was little in the shape of civilian aid, if one compares the actual dollar amount between the military assistance and civilian aid. I am not suggesting that nothing was done, and I am not attempting to down play, or God forbid demonize the American assistance, but I am , trying to draw attention to the very little civilian aid, at least so far. Therefore, in order to truly help Pakistan, Holbrooke will have to reassess the issue of civilian aid. In fact, if Richard Holbrooke is serious about stabilizing Pakistan, he will have to really to take control of the civilian aid issue.

In addition to civilian economic aid, Islamabad also needs a realistic and comprehensive strategy to overcome the colossal challenges that are destroying Pakistan’s future. Ironically, good governance is not easy in a country like Pakistan. For decades, corruption has been a cancer in Pakistani society and this issue has to be taken into account without blaming any particular government.

Lack of trust in successive governments by Pakistanis is another problem that won’t go away. Repeated military inventions have destroyed democratic institutions. Add to this mix the overall deteriorating economic, political and social situation in the country. If all this was not enough, the dangerously high birth rate in Pakistan has been eating away whatever little progress was made in any particular field. More alarmingly, the recent rise in suicide attacks against Pakistan and the military operation against the evil Taliban has jolted Pakistan to its very core. Further exasperating the situation is the horrific power shortage across Pakistan that is playing havoc with lives, and businesses. In other words, there are mountains of serious challenges for Pakistan to tackle, and Islamabad lacks the means to deal with so many issues threatening the country. Therefore, Holbrook will have to understand that Pakistan’s problems are inter-linked. Washington cannot single out one particular problem to assist Pakistan. The aid and assistance has to be designed to address all issues at once, otherwise, the vicious cycle of problems multiplying will continue.

The recent Al-Jazeera poll demonstrated, once again, the growing anti American sentiment in Pakistan. Since Pakistanis don’t trust America at the moment, Richard Holbrooke’s visits actually compound the problem instead of improving American image in Pakistan. In fact, every time Holbrooke visits Pakistan, the anger towards Washington intensifies. Moreover, Holbrooke’s recent suggestion that the military operation should be expanded to Waziristan has given more ammunition to leading American critics in Pakistan. Holbrooke should have delivered this message quietly to the government, if it was necessary.

Also, Holbrooke is meeting people from all walks of life, but this effort too is back firing because these people, especially members of the religious parties go on television and boast that they told Holbrooke and most of the time it is not pleasant.

Richard Holbrooke also met people from all walks of life in Karachi, but there is no reason to believe that these meetings either improve America’s image or help Holbrooke understand anything that he already doesn’t know.

By now, Americans know very well how Pakistanis view America.

If America is really serious about helping Pakistan get out of the current mess, as well as winning the ‘hearts and minds’ across Pakistan, they should scale back their activities in Pakistan. The fact that Americans are constructing a new super embassy in Islamabad which according to a report will house 350 marines, is not the way to convince Pakistanis that America is a friend.

If and when the economic and social situation in Pakistan started getting better with the help of Americans and the results of these improvements were felt by the masses, it would become easier for America to claim that Washington is an ally and a friend. Therefore, Holbrooke should work out the details of directly financing projects that Pakistan desperately needs instead of handing over money to Islamabad. This is the best way to ease the pain at the grocery store, and at the petrol pump etc. Similarly it is equally important to urgently address the on-going energy crisis in Pakistan. This is the quickest way to uplift Pakistan, because when Pakistanis notice the overall improvement in the country, anti American sentiment would automatically go down.

100 American visas for businessmen in Karachi, as announced by Holbrooke during a meeting with the business community will not help, despite being a good effort because these businessmen already have valid visas for the U.S.

Winning hearts and minds in Pakistan is not going to be easy if Holbrooke shows up every couple of months to tell Pakistanis what they need to do. This is considered interference and it adds fuel to the already burning fire of anti-American sentiment. Holbrooke should rely on American embassy’s staff in Islamabad to give him the actual situation about the difficulties faced by ordinary people. As long as ordinary Pakistanis are in pain, it would be impossible for Americans to connect with any segment of the society.

The time has come for Washington to make a decision vis-à-vis Pakistan and its future. If Washington wants to continue on this path which results in unfriendly public, fine. However, if the Americans are honestly attempting to help Pakistanis, they must work on a different plan to directly invest to tackle the multiple crises about to swallow country’s future.


(source:foreignpolicyblogs.com)

Richard Holbrooke

Richard  doing great works for pakistan. He continue in contact Politicians,Taliban,Mujahideen,CIA,Afghanistan,and develop his country desires. 
Add caption
Richard Charles Albert Holbrooke (born April 24, 1941), Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan under the Obama administration, is a top-ranking American diplomat, magazine editor, author, professor, Peace Corps official, and investment banker. He is also the only person to have held the Assistant Secretary of State position for two different regions of the world (Asia from 1977–1981, and Europe from 1994–1996).
From 1993–1994, he was U.S. Ambassador to Germany. Although long well-known in diplomatic and journalistic circles, Holbrooke achieved great public prominence only when he brokered a peace agreement among the warring factions in Bosnia that led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords, in 1995. Holbrooke was a contender in the replacement of Warren Christopher but ultimately lost to Madeleine Albright in 1997 when Bill Clinton chose a replacement for the Secretary of State. From 1999–2001, Holbrooke served as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.
He was an advisor to the Presidential campaign of Senator John Kerry in 2004. Holbrooke then joined the Presidential campaign of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and became a top foreign policy adviser; Holbrooke was considered a candidate for Secretary of State in a Clinton or Barack Obama administration.
On January 22, 2009, Holbrooke was appointed as a special adviser on Pakistan and Afghanistan, working under President of the United States Barack Obama and United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Corruption and fallad relief pakistan

At every turn, countries, charitable foundations, wealthy individuals and even schoolchildren are refusing to give the Pakistani government money to deal with the floods that have ruined as many as 20 million lives. The European Union has angered Islamabad by giving its aid money to Western and Pakistani non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Leading international agencies and other countries have followed suit or sent relief goods rather than cash. Pakistanis are scandalised and embarrassed that their politicians, bureaucrats and generals have fostered so much corruption for so long that nobody trusts them to deal fairly with the victims of this summer’s historic floods. Yet early actions indicate the sceptics are right feudal landlords and politicians have been accused, according to news reports, of breaching levees to save their lands or diverting relief goods to their constituents.
Since the flooding began five weeks ago, neither President Asif Ali Zardari nor Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gillani has sought to assemble a truly transparent mechanism that would receive and spend aid money. In contrast, Pakistan’s army, central government, four provincial governments and National Assembly have each set up separate flood relief funds to which few Pakistanis are contributing because nobody trusts them. With international financial institutions and the US government assembling at least $3 billion to help rebuild Pakistan’s devastated infrastructure, it is time for our kleptomaniac rulers to get their act together and make efforts to restore withering public trust.
Pakistan’s civilian government needs a trust fund along the lines of the one funding the Afghan government, army and police. Such a fund would not only monitor donated cash but help the government put together a non-political reconstruction effort. It could give a voice to the competent Pakistani technocrats, NGO workers and economists that the government has so far ignored. Such a reconstruction trust fund could be run by the World Bank and other international lending agencies. It should be overseen on the ground by independent Pakistani economists and social welfare figures. Pakistan’s bureaucracy and army, who would be implementing the plans, could have seats at the table, but they should not have veto power over how the money comes in or is spent. The fund could also help plan long-term economic reforms such as expanding the tax base (only 2.3 million of the 170 million Pakistanis pay tax) and insisting that landlords pay income tax this revenue is desperately needed, but no government has had the political will to implement such reforms.
No doubt, the ruling elite will cry that this would be intolerable for an independent nation and nuclear power. But the truth is that Pakistan lost its sovereignty a long time ago, when the ruling elite abandoned the poor and lost interest in economic development in favour of foreign loans, and the army wilfully ceded territory and population to militant Islamic networks. Further, the dismal response to the flood damage has eroded the people’s trust in government on a scale nearly matching 1971, when a typhoon in the eastern half of Pakistan drew no response from the western Pakistani elite, and the ruling elite lost East Pakistan, which is now Bangladesh.
It is urgent that steps be taken immediately already, a major fight has erupted between Islamabad and the four provinces over how to spend relief money. Opposition leader Nawaz Sharif claims that Islamabad is not providing funds to his province, Punjab the poorest province, Balochistan, which was racked by insurgency even before it suffered enormous flood damage, is not receiving relief goods on a scale going to the other provinces. The northern-most province, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, has perhaps suffered the most infrastructure damage, but its calls for long-term aid have gone unanswered, according to news reports. Meanwhile, the long-time politician Altaf Hussain, an acolyte of the military whose party controls Karachi, has called for a “French Revolution”-style uprising and a military-led government a threat to the fledgling democracy that has taken shape since 10 years of destructive military rule ended in 2007. And amid all the destruction, the Pakistani Taliban is on the move 100 people were killed in suicide bombings in Lahore and Quetta last week, for which the Pakistani Taliban asserted responsibility. Separatists in Balochistan are taking advantage of the chaos to mount an assassination campaign against non-Balochs in their province.
The political infighting and threats will worsen as the waters recede and haphazard reconstruction starts. Reconstruction left to the government will be dominated by the interests of local politicians and feudal lords. A rational, fair plan is needed to cope with the massive scale of destruction 5,000 miles of road and rail washed away, up to a thousand bridges ruined, 7,000 schools and 400 health clinics destroyed, vast areas of the north still cut off. A fifth of Pakistan’s agricultural land is under water, foreshadowing food shortages. The threat of epidemics among flood victims looms.
The Obama administration has done sterling work in its contributions and in prompting the international community to do more. Now, it should help Pakistan plan for the future. Sen. John Kerry has noted that “by helping Pakistan do it right, the US can have a positive and lasting impact.” First and foremost, Pakistanis need to know how the aid is going to be spent. The writer, a Pakistani journalist, is most recently the author of “Descent Into Chaos The US and the Disaster in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia.” The Washington Post


(source:pakistanherald.com)

More U.S aid for Pakistan,by Hillary Clinton today 22 October 2010


Next fisical  year Pakistan will be pay more then Ten Billion U.S.Dollars interest to IMF & World Bank 1/3 of Budget of Pakistan. That money will be go in Allies    
She's laughing on?


pokets.They were already Pick up back lone money in shape of consulting, contracts,kickbacks.Pakistan will continued Supprot in war on terror.Allies 
continue gain advanteges of Unipolar superpower. Pakistan continue in pain in shape of  bomb explosions by artificial Taliban and Mujahideen created by International spy agensies.Also US$150 billion economical lose in last 30 years.
Now in Pakistan 15000PRs per month income is count as poverty.Cottage industry is completely dead due to loadsheading.
We are all pakistani thank full to creating this sitchuation specially,X presidents of United States Geoge Bush,senior & junior,X Secretaries Condoleezza Rice and Medline Olbright.
Also President Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton for continue there practices.
Oh one thing we miss we are hardly thanks of our own Rolers,X and now dead and live. President Asif Ali Zardari,Prime Minister Seyd Yousuf Gilani,X President Pervez Musharraf,Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz,X President Farooq Laghari,X Prime Minister Shaheed Benazir Bhutto,X President Muhammad Rafiq Tarar,X Prime Ministr Nawaz Sharif.X President Ghulam Ishaq Khan,X Prime Minister Mumammad Khan Junejo,X Pesident Mumammad Zia-ul-haq,Osamabin Laden,CIA,
Also  there teams don hard work for Dark Age To Pakistan.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh one thing we don't know judiciary.

Say i Khudi Zuljalal,

Comments on Hillary And  Quraishi's Washington D.C. press conference today.